In all analyses statistical significance was set at p When you look at the Fig Salt sensitive: Participants with SBP being at least 5 mmHg higher after HS intake compared to the values after the LS intake; Salt resistant: Participants whose SBP differed by Mathematical analysis General linear habits was used for linear regression investigation (Pearson’s Roentgen correlation) to evaluate the newest connection out of urinary Na + and you can K + excretion which have SBP. To own Figs. 2 and you may 3, two-method ANOVA having Tukey’s article hoc is actually performed examine SBP among the communities laid out based on urinary Na + and K + removal. So you can quantify the potency of broadening urinary Na + and you can K + excretion in accordance with SBP, Cohn’s Impact Proportions was computed. Inside the Figs. cuatro and you can 5 general Pearson’s Roentgen relationship is performed to assess this new organization of one’s urinary Na + :K + removal ratio that have SBP. six research was indeed examined by the a beneficial three-means ANOVA and pairwise contrasting have been made having fun with Tukey’s post hoc test. eight relative frequency shipments is analyzed playing with good Gaussian fit study. 05 (GraphPad prism app, variation 8). Analysis was displayed given that indicate ± SD. Baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) at screening on regular diet (a) according to changes sodium excretion of Baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) at screening on regular diet (a) according to changes potassium excretion for salt sensitive (n = 186) and salt resistant (n = 222) group, slope for salt sensitive and salt resistant group is indicated for the potassium excretion range Baseline SBP relative to urinary salt to help you potassium excretion proportion (Na + /K + ) (a) relationship off standard SBP (dependent varying) along side entire directory of urinary Na + /K + excretion (separate varying), (Pearson’s R 2 for salt delicate = 0.0004 and you can sodium unwilling = 0.0016) (b) standard SBP considering changes in salt excretion and you can potassium excretion range when you look at the salt painful and sensitive (n = 186) and sodium unwilling (n = 222) anyone in the evaluation on the typical diet plan, beliefs shown just like the mean ± SD. Study have been reviewed by three-means ANOVA that have pairwise evaluation accompanied by Tukey’s article hoc shot. Correlation of SBP beliefs across the whole a number of urinary salt so you can potassium removal (Na + /K + ) proportion into the sodium painful and sensitive (letter = 71) and you can salt unwilling (n = 119) individuals with losing weight input of your own Fat loss Approaches to Prevent Blood pressure (DASH) (a) higher salt (HS), (Pearson’s Roentgen 2 to own salt painful and sensitive = 0.04 and salt resistant = 0.04) (b) reasonable salt (LS) eating plan, (Pearson’s Roentgen 2 getting salt sensitive and painful = 0.02 and you may sodium resistant = 0.00002).

In all analyses statistical significance was set at p < 0

When you look at the Fig

Salt sensitive: Participants with SBP being at least 5 mmHg higher after HS intake compared to the values after the LS intake; Salt resistant: Participants whose SBP differed by <5 mmHg between HS and LS intakes; Independent variables: Urinary Na + , Urinary K + and Na + :K + excretion ratio; Dependent variable: SBP; Categorical variable: Participants were categorized into groups on the basis of increments of 1 g/day in urinary Na + and K + excretion to evaluate the linear trends

Mathematical analysis

General linear habits was used for linear regression investigation (Pearson’s Roentgen correlation) to evaluate the newest connection out of urinary Na + and you can K + excretion which have SBP. To own Figs. 2 and you may 3, two-method ANOVA having Tukey’s article hoc is actually performed examine SBP among the communities laid out based on urinary Na + and K + removal. So you can quantify the potency of broadening urinary Na + and you can K + excretion in accordance with SBP, Cohn’s Impact Proportions was computed. Inside the Figs. cuatro and you can 5 general Pearson’s Roentgen relationship is performed to assess this new organization of one’s urinary Na + :K + removal ratio that have e-chat SBP. six research was indeed examined by the a beneficial three-means ANOVA and pairwise contrasting have been made having fun with Tukey’s post hoc test. eight relative frequency shipments is analyzed playing with good Gaussian fit study. 05 (GraphPad prism app, variation 8). Analysis was displayed given that indicate ± SD.

Baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) at screening on regular diet (a) according to changes sodium excretion of <5 g/day, in salt sensitive (n = 154) and salt resistant (n = 180) group, slope of the for salt sensitive group is indicated for the sodium excretion ranges of <2–2.99 g/day, 3–3.99 g/day and 4–4.99 g/day (b) Correlation of baseline SBP (dependent variable) across the entire range of urinary sodium excretion (independent variable), (Pearson's R 2 for salt sensitive = 0.02 and for salt resistant = 0.02), in salt sensitive (n = 186) and salt resistant (n = 222) individuals.

Baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) at screening on regular diet (a) according to changes potassium excretion for salt sensitive (n = 186) and salt resistant (n = 222) group, slope for salt sensitive and salt resistant group is indicated for the potassium excretion range <1–1.99 g/day, values shown as mean ± SD. b Correlation of baseline SBP (dependent variable) across the entire range urinary potassium excretion (independent variable), (Pearson's R 2 for salt sensitive = 0.001 and salt resistant = 0.008), in salt sensitive (n = 186) and salt resistant (n = 222) individuals.

Baseline SBP relative to urinary salt to help you potassium excretion proportion (Na + /K + ) (a) relationship off standard SBP (dependent varying) along side entire directory of urinary Na + /K + excretion (separate varying), (Pearson’s R 2 for salt delicate = 0.0004 and you can sodium unwilling = 0.0016) (b) standard SBP considering changes in salt excretion and you can potassium excretion range when you look at the salt painful and sensitive (n = 186) and sodium unwilling (n = 222) anyone in the evaluation on the typical diet plan, beliefs shown just like the mean ± SD. Study have been reviewed by three-means ANOVA that have pairwise evaluation accompanied by Tukey’s article hoc shot.

Correlation of SBP beliefs across the whole a number of urinary salt so you can potassium removal (Na + /K + ) proportion into the sodium painful and sensitive (letter = 71) and you can salt unwilling (n = 119) individuals with losing weight input of your own Fat loss Approaches to Prevent Blood pressure (DASH) (a) higher salt (HS), (Pearson’s Roentgen 2 to own salt painful and sensitive = 0.04 and salt resistant = 0.04) (b) reasonable salt (LS) eating plan, (Pearson’s Roentgen 2 getting salt sensitive and painful = 0.02 and you may sodium resistant = 0.00002).

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.